I'm a sucker for mythology, and which is the main reason I like Grimm so much. But I'm very particular about how mythology is presented-- I don't like when people deviate so far from the original story so much that a legend essentially gets rewritten with the original one forgotten (for example, Aaron was portrayed as an antagonist in The Prince of Egypt rather than as Moses's right-hand man).
That said, who better to write a book about Grimm's backstory than a mythologist like Nathan Robert Brown? The portions I've read so far tell me he's even more meticulous than I am with researching myths, and that has me super-impressed already.
Mr. Brown smartly starts off with the not the backstory, but the backstory's backstory. He provides a great insight into the hardships faced by the Grimm brothers to help us better grasp what was going through their minds when they recorded the fairy tales that have been perpetuated to this day-- or rather, severely twisted and then retold by the family-safe culture of the 20th and 21st centuries. (Side note-- did you know that the Grimms didn't actually write the fairy tales? They interviewed stay-at-home moms to find out what stories had been passed down through the generations.)
Brown provides unique retellings of many of the stories that serve as Grimm backstories. They're definitely not the versions you'd expect though, and here's why:
- Being the responsible mythologist Brown is, he recognizes that the Grimm producers used the Grimm version of the tale, not the 20th-/21st-century family-friendly version. So the version he tells us is the one where Grandma and Red Riding-Hood both get eaten by the Big Bad Wolf, and the huntsman cuts him open with a pair of scissors to rescue them both. He also includes the Grimm brothers' forgotten sequel in which Red Riding-Hood and Grandma show a second Big Bad Wolf who's boss.
- Being mindful his reader-base might include a few nontraditionalists who like things presented in a modern light, he not only uses modern English (thankfully!) but also adds a flavorful commentary that helps us put the story into better perspective.
For example, instead of this (quoted from Jane Yolen's "Grimm's Complete Fairy Tales"):
we read this:
Often, that perspective is a comical one. Hey, we all need some comic relief once in awhile!
From "English Fairy Tales", collected by Joseph Jacobs in 1890:
Brown's version:
With comic relief like this, it's a chore to put this book down!
Brown doesn't just draw from the obvious. He goes much deeper than any of us ever bothered. For example, just how tough is a Siegbarste if you need an elephant gun to even phase him? Could Holly Clark have survived for that long in the woods if she wasn't a Blutbad? What are those other trailer weapons Nick hasn't learned the names for yet? What's the story behind calling a Ziegevolk a "bluebeard"? Are the Coins of Zakynthos based on the Lord of the Rings, or are they both based on something older? And could Monroe's Blutbad aspect completely pass under the radar of a psychiatrist as a mental disorder?
These questions and more are all answered in astounding detail, in....
The mythology of Grimm: The fairy tale and folklore roots of the popular TV show by Nathan Robert Brown (author of The mythology of the supernatural)
Bottom line: If you like mythology, you'll love this.
p.s. Oh, and I forgot to add-- as a die-hard fan of the show and wiki editor, I am amazed at the vast amount of new information I found in these pages. This isn't anything like those publications on the Grimm website or the iTunes Grimm app that just restate what we already know! And what's even better-- it's not fanfic!