Do we really want a category for things like this? We'd need "Canine", "Snake", etc. And why stop there?....then above that comes "Mammal" and "Reptile" and "Bird"..... Not needed. - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 00:16, December 13, 2012 (UTC)

I agree, it's not really needed. Eventually there will be too many categories like this and it will get out of hand. PDXTalk     02:32, December 13, 2012 (UTC)
I don't see why not, as long as we stick to classes of animals that wesen which have appeared resemble, theres no need (at the present) for there to be seperate classes in anything but mammal wesen, we can group all the bird, fish and reptile wesen simply under Bird, Fish and Reptile. As for mammals we simply make seperate catagories, if more than one type has appeared. Granted it needs to be monitored to stop it going out of hand, but I don't see any problem with it. General MGD 109 (talk) 15:46, December 13, 2012 (UTC)
It serves no purpose other than to make clutter. - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 18:04, December 13, 2012 (UTC)

We should only go as specific as we need to. We should not even have a separate snake category just yet. I say we start out with the main ones; Mammal, Reptile, Bird, Invertebrates and mythical. From their, if there is three or more of one kind (such as canines) they would get their own category to keep it organized.A'denSkirata (talk) 18:29, December 13, 2012 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.