Board Thread:General Grimm Discussion/@comment-3125844-20150704181713/@comment-82.21.236.214-20150707213316

Perhaps David was about to say 'Juliette's not dead.'

@bheadr27 I agree with you. First time I saw it, it looked like it was below the collarbone. Subsequent pics and articles stte it was a neck shot. I've commendted about this scene quite a lot before. When you see Juliette shot, the bolts appear to be more than 90 degrees apart - I estimate 120, but when you see her cradled in Nick's arms, the angle looks less than 90 degrees. It's still not close enough for Trubel to have fired both bolts in succession. Hence mty second shooter theory.

It could just be a very poorly done stunt. An impact to the body left of centre ought to turn the right shoulder towards the shooter, but Juliette doesn't move in any direction. The bolts just hit her where she's standing. We do knowthat Juliette is a very ppowerful hexenbiest with considerable telekentic powers. That they were operating is evident that the wounds were ot as pronounced as they ought to have been fired at point blank range. If it's possible Juliette has powers of illusion, there is the possibilty that what Nick and Trubel thought was happening, wasn't.

I am surprised the audience at the con is goingto see a 'preview'. Perhaps they wantto test viewer reaction to what they are planning and have already shot. If there's a riot, they'll have to go back and rethink.