Board Thread:General Grimm Discussion/@comment-24.150.82.174-20150428165432/@comment-25875828-20150622231804

70.88.128.113 wrote: I agree I think she's had enough of doing bad things to people, and being manipulated into doing bad things as well. After all, we know she wants to be a good mom to both her children. And given that Nick, her son's dad, has not turned his back on her since learning that he is going to have a son (and we know he intends to take responsibility for the boy), I don't think she'll betray him. I enjoy the optimism. But at least sight something from the show to support this idea of change. Show where some character has learned their lesson instead of just getting better.

The entire comment is based on what would be the right thing to do. Yes the right thing would be ADalind realize that a life of crime will only lead to heartache. The right thing would be Adalind realize she has two kids and as a mother they should come first.

But show one time where Adalind put anyone first. Show one time given the option she does the right thing.

Just dealing with the events after the so called change. Even the change Adalind ask for protection. When both SEan and Nick turned her down. She plays the baby card. Not the first time she has used her child for leverage.

Adalind knows Kenneth's plan but does she tell Nick to help work against Kenneth. No she is hoping Kenneth will get Diana back in Portland so Adalind iwth smoe misguided notion can get her back.

Adalind had not problem telling Viktor all about Nicks plans. If it wasn't for Adalind the roylas would have never known Kelly had Diana, mean Kelly woudl have never been a target.

If Adalind is suppose to be changing sides. Then why not approach Juliette as hexenbiest to hexenbiest and work with her learnig to deal with her powers and the royals. Like Adalind said who hasn't torn up a bar.

Optimism is good, to look fo the good in people is also great. But like Bitsie said a happy ending don't hold your breath.