Board Thread:Spoilers/@comment-3125844-20150123235427/@comment-64.231.120.181-20150211222509

78.55.11.172 wrote: 1.of course she did evil things, she is one of the main villains in grimm (ok a not so dangerous villain but a villain)

2. she doesnt care anymore for the royals vs grimm stuff, she just wants to be with her child, she works with viktor out of desperation(she is all alone in the world!)

3a what nick and the others did to her is cruelsom, they could have sent her with kelly and diana, she was willing to do everything they want as long as they protect her and her child

3b kelly left nick with her sister,the person she trusted the most, and  she always knew where he was and that he was safe and it was her own choice, now compare kelly with adalind                                                                                                                                adalind first thought that the royals took her baby and then found out that a              -wesen-killer-woman has her baby

3c it is really ok that kelly wants to raise diana as her own daughter? seems a bit egoistic to me, at least she could have sent a photo of diana to sean

4. the royals blackmailed her, "sleep with nick so that he loses his powers or you will never see your NEWBORN baby  again", you cant blame her for that!

5. i dont think that all the others are soooo good, sean is sean(i wonder if he was the same in his first years as a police officer????)

ok rosalee is a good person but that she doesnt want nick not to investigate the murder in the last episode just because she doesnt want to mess with the council shows that she would accept injustice as long as no "laws" are broken,

OK adalind is evil and egoistic and who knows what else but thats her character(and her job, see nr1) and i like that because that makes her (and the captain) intersting, rosalee and juliette are always just good and supporting,not more,thats boring and she brings comedy to the show, its funny how the gang has always to deal with her and renard kind of babysitting her(also in the future he is not so careless to let his childs mother be killed) and at last : her behaviour is normal, because no one is always and to everyone good, her behaviour is human (i know she is a hexenbiest)

ps not native speaker

Your first point proves my entire point. Yes she is the villain. It is precisely BECAUSE she is the villain that she is unworthy of our pity. The fact that a story needs a bad guy does not excuse the bad guys actions, and adalinds actions are particularly evil.

Let me put this as plainly and as finally as I can. It does not matter how desperate, miserable or in pain she is. What matters is that she has committed heinous acts for the wrong reasons and the wrong people. She has hurt people who have done her no harm and, most importantly, she feels no remorse for the pain and suffering she has caused. She is the antithesis of innocent. Therefore...

She. Deserves. Every. Pain. She. Gets.

I do not see why this is such a difficult concept for some to get their head around. Why should anyone care for the suffering of an evil person? It is like the old saying about the Assyrians...

"Those of us who hear of your end clap our hands at your downfall, for who has not felt your unrelenting cruelty?"