Board Thread:Episode Discussion/@comment-33188476-20160321205004/@comment-3544496-20160411095215

Brimmski wrote: TheJorgon23 wrote: Aboutnici wrote:

PolarBearMan wrote:

71.166.62.83 wrote: Sorry. That would be too awkaward. Besides, I believe Nick made it clear he would never take Eve/Juliette back anyway, not after what Juliette did to his mother. The way I see it, he'd choose Adalind (and Kelly, of course) over here anyday now. And I don't think Eve is really looking for a relationship with anyone. Adalind caused his mums death... Meaning Sean caused his mums death... Adalind and Renard respected Nick's mom and she did not cause his mom's death, but Juliette did, she stood by and let the Royals kill his mom, so they can kidnap Diana. What gets me is that the Nadalind shippers want to absolve Adalind of all responsibility for her actions because 'hexenbiest' and yet condemn Juliette for the same reason. I am a hearty bit of repeating the same, all things Adalind did was for malice and gaining status, all that Juliette did was for revenge. Juliette never intended to make Kelly died, both writers and the actress has confirmed that, since the Adalind always had the intention to kill, never had the opportunity to do so, since someone always prevented her from doing the worse, and Juliette/Eve NEVER directly killed anyone innocent, and indirectly never intended to do so. I, in my opinion, still find that Adalind's sins are far worse, but one thing is certain the Hexenbiest's makes this two change completely.

Well if thats the case then any Dictator or Criminal mastermind are not "guilty" say Stalin, Sadam, Hitler or Kim Jungon, because they NEVER directly killed anyone (as we know). Horrible annalogy, I get it why you look for excuses to defend "Juliette" but its just flawed. There's a reason why snitches get killed, even though they NEVER killed anyone. :) Dude really?! Complety diferent!