Board Thread:Episode Discussion/@comment-3125844-20150424201205/@comment-83.74.42.244-20150510175020

(P) Macabros77 wrote: 83.74.42.244 wrote: (P) Macabros77 wrote: First of all austria has no official king or royal family, which means the royals in grimm is only royal in wesen eyes,and therefore no immunity (in promo photo kenneth is in cuffs).

Regarding if diana belongs with adalind or not, for a contract to be binding it needs to be signed without coercion, and frankly putting a bloody handprint on a piece paper and try to explain it was of their own free will, in my book there is no contract.

but let us for argues sake say the contract was signed kind of legal, when stefania went behind adalinds back to strike a deal with the royals stefania herself broke the contract.

So to sum up Diana is Adalind`s Daughter and Adalind has every right to have her daughter back Yes, I know. That's why they took Austria ( and not England, Denmark, Spain). It's not the point and is always the same diplomatic procedure.

And if Stefania strikes a deal or not, doesn't care. Adalind sold Diana for getting her powers back. ( in former times they signed with the right thumb). And even today  ( for example some countries in south america)) That was the deal, she didn't want money. In this moment she lost every right on her child.

And even if a judge would say the contract was illegal, she would have to give back what has been given to her.

adalind made the contract to give stefania the baby, but stefania betrays her and want to give adalind and her baby to the royals, if stefania had waited for diana to be born she could have given her to the royals, but in trying to give adalind to the royals she puts adalind`s life in danger and that was not part of the deal.