Board Thread:General Grimm Discussion/@comment-24.150.82.174-20150428165432/@comment-25875828-20151113192441

This post make my point. All of the above would be true if they where real people. But to assign a moral complaint to something that is obviously a plot device, keeps the viewer from following the writers intent. They whole idea of people wanting Adalind to have a happy life with both her children, because that is what a mother should strive for. Means the viewer is not even understand what the writers are trying to do. The whole show is about trials an trbulations, conflict and confusion.

In the previous post when Lurkenfur was listing episode with happy ending. The examples are WOW. All of the WOW have a positive out come. I was referring to the main characters, they never get happy endings. When ever their story seems to be going well, you can be sure the conflict and chaos is around the corner.

We can see in the previews, and in the interviews, Rosalee and Monroe trun has come to have their happy home torn apart. For as long as they have gone wit no real confllict I can bet, their conflict will be bad.

Their was and interview that predicted that another major character will die on the show. Lukenfur made some really good points about writer formulatic structure. The writers are building Adalind to try hard to become a good person. This is almost positive proof that she will be the one that dies. What more of an impact then to take someone that was evil, then worked toward becoming reformed, only to be killed off. The comments would then be if only she had given her a chance, she was really becoming a good person.

Killing Adalind would solve a few problems. The biggest is Diana and Kelly, considering the show, and not what woudl be morally right. You can not have Adalind raising both kids. Also they have to get Nick in a position where he is by himself and can be the Grimm he needs to be. You also have to consider, they uprising will have to cause Nick to pay a price.