Board Thread:General Grimm Discussion/@comment-26235944-20150608025717/@comment-26976525-20151023200009

Katerine459 wrote: I agree; I think Meisner was either working on his own, or he was working for Tavitian. I doubt Sean will shed any tears over the King's death, but I don't think he had anything to do with it, either. I think this because:

1) Sean had a lot of other things on his mind at the time; he was still recovering from the whole Jack the Ripper thing.

2) This must have taken a lot of planning and infiltration, during which time, Sean would have been preoccupied with Jack the Ripper and with Juliette.

3) It doesn't seem subtle enough for a "Sean" plan. Eric's assassination and the assassination of that random cousin (whose name I forget) seem like exceptions rather than the rule. They were performed because Sean was pushed to the edge, and always in circumstances that he was either personally far removed from (like with Eric) or with circumstances that, as a captain in the PPD, he could control (like with the random cousin). The King's death will launch a major investigation with authorities that aren't under Sean's command, and could point back to him or Nick. Juliette was staying with Renard. Juliette was sleeping with Kenneth. Juliette was staying with the King in the "rental" out of Portland's jurisdiction. If anybody was in a position to give Renard inside info on what the King was doing it was Juliette.

Nick had rejected Juliette, so she went over to Renard who seems to have appreciated her abilities better than Nick did. And Kenneth said Diana was taken with Juliette. I think Juliette was trying to protect Diana not harming her. She told Nick she didn't realize Kenneth would kill Kelly in the bargain.

A lot of miscommunication going on between Nick, Renard and Juliette.