Board Thread:General Grimm Discussion/@comment-24399666-20151114213555/@comment-26144319-20151120202917

Syscrash53 wrote: That is based on Kelly being a pivotal character. It is more then likely Kelly will be more a concept then an actual character. He will be more like Diana. The bases for a number of actions, someone who is mentioned but has very little interaction with the other characters. He will seldomly be seen on the show.

Even know I have only seen the baby playing Kelly about three times. Nick holding him once, Adalind holding him twice. We have seen many scenes that would lead us to believe Kelly is there but seldomly actual see him. Even when we see him in his carrier, or someone holding him  you can tell it is a cut away shot, not part of the actual scene.

As much as the post keep speculating on Nick and Kelly's interaction, and the desire to see father and son moments. I cannot see that happening. Not because he is not a loving father, but that is not the format of how the show works. A good example is examine how they did the Adalind and Diana interactions. Of all the times they showed Diana you can tell the characters had no direct interaction. That is why you never see anyone feeding, changing, bathing or any of the other things that would require direct interaction.

In short babies on set add a lot of complications to the shoot. That is why baby shots are cut aways. Direct interactions you have to be able to do retakes. That is way the idea of the baby there is prefered then actually having the baby there.

Sorry folks but the shot of Nick playing with Kelly will more then likely never happen. If it does it will be some kind of split screen shot.
 * facepalm* Just because one character got the silent treatment DOESN'T MEAN THE THE SECOND WILL AS WELL! It takes time for that crap, and also, I have a feeling your ass is going to be wrong as the fact that this is a drama, but that doesn't fully go right for the throat. Nick isn't dumb enough to actually let someone take his child, and who in the world would want to take him anyway, KSB doesn't have any power, he's not useful, so why take him? And besides, the royals are the only people besides the resistance who actually pull that off. But why would they take him?! He doesn't have any powers yet nor part of the royals, he's just some kid. Also, even if it's not seen, that doesn't mean anything. If the show is going to make him like his sister, He's useless....a complete waste of a character. With Diana, there were reasons why she was taken, because her mom was warned if she was kept around, Renard Adalind, and Diana would die, and she also had some powers early, and was a Royal Family Member, that's why they took her. KSB on the other hand, lacks these requirements, so he's not gonna be taken. Also, THEY CAN'T HELP IT THAT NICK ISN'T DIRECTLY INTERACTING WITH KSB, I get that it's a drama, but that doesn't mean they're dumb enough to not show one moment of Nick being with his son, if they don't have a moment of his parents interacting with him, or having a plot twist that involves him, or anything, then he's a complete waste of a character, because unlike his sister who has some potential, he lacks potential, so that would damage his precense even more!