Board Thread:Spoilers/@comment-3125844-20150123235427/@comment-64.231.120.181-20150212002623

Syscrash53 wrote: actually only Adalind commited attemted mudrer and that was with Hank. Going after Marie is not mudrer, she is a Grimm adalind is a hexenbiest.

Rosalee did not commit murder that is Blutbad against Faushbau. The problem come in when you have humans involved.

Also if you notice there are times when Nick uses his gun and time when he uses his weapons. If he where to eliminate a wesen problem by shotting them he would have a problem. Take their head off no problem. For it to make sense you have to keep the two worlds seperate. The writers seem to do a pretty good job at that. You are wrong on both counts with adalind. With Hank it was not really attempted murder because she was not intent on killing him, merely using him as leverage against Nick. the charge would be closer to reckless/willful endangerment (which is not really that much less evil). And how is Adalind trying to poison Marie (who was unconscious and incapable of defending herself) not attempted murder just because one is a grimm and the other is hexenbiest? They are both Sentient beings and one is trying to kill the other unprovoked. Next you will be saying that it was not murder when Orson killed Hap...

You are correct with regards to rosalee, but not for the reasons you stated. Her killing the Grandmaster was justified because he was about to kill Monroe, not because they were different Wesen species.

Also, I do not see the significance with when he kills with his gun vs when he kills with somthing else. a kill is a kill. it does not matter how you do it because the end result is the same. The only reason to kill with something other than his gun is so that Ballistic evidence doesn't lead back to him.