Board Thread:Episode Discussion/@comment-49.204.164.219-20150509070000/@comment-174.92.12.114-20150513035223

Syscrash53 wrote: 174.92.12.114 wrote: syscrash, stop defending Juliette. Its annoying.

Juliette share of blame in kellys death is exceeded only by Kenneth himself. She willingly (she was not forced or tricked) lured Kelly into the trap that killed her, knowing full well that that was the outcome (either that, or she is suffering from a massive amount of brain damage). I agree that she will not kill Nick, but not for lack of trying. She will be stopped by being killed, incapaitated or forced to flee; the point where she would willing stay her hand is long passed. What would lead anyone to think  Kelly would have been killed in the trap. For four seasons we have seen the characters put in all kind of dangerious sitiuations. This is the first time someone actually died. Even with the neighbors the first guy you think ok they took him down. So you assumed they tied him up. It was not until the second neighbor that we realized oh they are killing people. Occams Razor. It is simpler (and thus more likly to be right) to assume that Kelly was killed and beheaded over any kind of magical trickery. Plus they couldn't even get the actual actress to portray her (which is probably why we don't see a fight scene), which doesn't bode well for kellys return.

FIRST TIME SOMEONE HAS DIED!!! DO YOU EVEN WATCH GRIMM?? THE SHOWS LEAD IS A HOMICIDE DETECTIVE!!!

How is our perception of what happened to the Neighbours relevent? How would thinking they merely incapcitated someone, only to learn that he was killed, change the fact that he was dead?

Also, why would you assume they would merely tie them up? that would require careing about their lives, which the Verrat most assuradly do not