Board Thread:Spoilers/@comment-3125844-20150123235427/@comment-64.231.120.181-20150211040933

I do not think you are getting my point. Lets look at your original statement.

Syscrash53 wrote: Monroe objection to Orson is because he is a Bauerschwein. Being attacked by Orson is his justification. But the fight is an on going feud between Blutbad and Bauerschwein. You will note that this claim (which is what I am refuting) does not state anywhere what monroe should do. You are instead making the claim that Monroes hatred of Orson is exclusively due to Orson being Baurschwein. My arguement (backed up with evidence) is that Monroes hatred is not only justified but is also NOT RACIALLY MOTIVATED. Killing someone of another race in cold blood because of who they were does not make the hatred of the friend of the victim (who happens to be of the same race) towards the killer any more racist than if the murderer had done it because he was a psychopath. If I was a member of the KKK and I killed an African-American for being who he was, would you say that the victims family would be racist for hating me?

Should Monroe be the bigger man and help anyway? Yes, but at no point in the Quote above did you argue that, instead theorising (incorrectly) that Moroes hatred was purly racial and thus unjust.

As for your response, I have a few things to say.

a) This may seem petty for me to ask, but could you please go over your entries with spellcheck before posting? it would make it easier to understand what you are arguing.

b) You may have had to interact with the cop in the story, but my point is that You would not like it at all.

c) Your story about working with the cop who shot your friend has a few holes in it. I am not talking about discrepincies which reveal you are lying (I have no reason to doubt you are telling the truth), but rather you have left out quite a bit of information. I do not know who your friend was, what race he was, what he was doing,  what the man who shot suspected him of doing, what the courts belived justified the shooting (I doubt he would still be on the job if he was convicted or awaiting trial), why the police supposedly hate you, evidence for or against the police actually hating you, past activities of either your friend or the officer and just the context of the event in general.

d) Given all that I do not know about your story, I may be very wrong, but it does not seem to me like your situation and Moroes situation are the same. You did not have to work with him; you had to cooperate with him (that is, unless you are a police officer who is investigating his own break in for some reason) which means your contact with him would have been minimal. Monroe is being asked to work side-by-side with Orson for an unknown period of time. The officer was there because you called the police (i assume you called them), wheras Monroe never expected to see Orsons face again. The killing of your friend, assuming complete innocence on his/her part, would have likly happened in the line of duty, with uncertainty regarding what the officer knew, thought he knew and what he thought the situation called for. Compare that to Orson, who killed in cold blood simply because they were Blutbad and stated as such. so, unless the officer in question simply walked up to your friend and shot him/her, I doubt the situations are similar.

Do not take this as a request to hear the entire story in detail. This is not the place for real-life event discussion. let us please stick to the hypothetical and the fictional from now on please.