Board Thread:General Grimm Discussion/@comment-76.30.64.208-20141207030619/@comment-1509826-20150507185804

108.94.10.102 wrote: Honestly, this whole thing has been so so so messed up the moment Adalind gave birth to Diana... I also except that both Adalind and Nick have chemistry- but Adalind DID technically rape Nick into coincedentally having a child together (which due to the Juliette-Adalind-Nick-sleeping-together thing, the baby could be either women's, Adalind didnt say she had a DNA check)...

Yeah that is a good point actually. It would be a real kick in the teeth for Adalind if it turned it wasn't hers. After having to give birth to him.

but think, Renard was the original bad guy in the first season's episodes. He ordered Adalind to do the bad things on behalf of the Royal Family originally...yet he was forgiven?

Yeah its confusing, I mean they spent a while building him up as the big bad and an evil counterpart to Nick. Then they reveal he's really a more anti-heroic figure. I wouldn't got as far as forgiven, the group work together, but I don't think Nick's truly trusted Renard since he found out the truth.

And I just hope and wish Juliett and Adalind just woge, shriek, and bust each other's heads off. Though that's not going to happen...

Shame.

And also according to the birthdates, Nick and Trubel are 13 years apart. I highly doubt that she's part of the Burkhardts family, maybe she's a Roleck of some sort. Or hey she could be a different Grimm from a completely unheard of Grimm family streak?

Its unlikely she's part of his direct family (I won't complain if she is though, I mean there certainly could pass for siblings). But she's probably slightly distantly related. The show seems to run on the idea all Grimms are in someway related (I mean Nick, Kelly and Marie always referred to every grimm as there Ancestors. And the books do suggest some sort of complicated linage).

Still its really unlikely to be anywhere close (as Nick said, probably shared an ancestor a couple hundred years ago).