Board Thread:General Grimm Discussion/@comment-25875828-20150512091124/@comment-82.21.236.214-20150525225705

@(P) Macabros77

This thread is not about the actions of other, but about Juliette and whether her actions merit hate.

You say you don't want to convince anyone, so why post endless defenses of Juliette. The showrunners themselves say that Juliette in Nick's arms with two bolts in her that may be laced with poison was inevitable given what she had done.

You see her as misguided, irrational and ruthless. You don't see her as a monster. Your standard of proof is that of a child abuser, murderer or torturer. The 16 points you said wouldn't stand up to a Justice TV and anyway were the product of errors made by lots of people. You don't blame Nick alone.

Guess what I don't blame Nick at all. It was all Juliette. The 16 points are Juliette's actions. They are what she has done. There's no show trial here. The real killers didn't escape justice. King Frederic got pushed out of his helicopter and must be presumed deceased (though I think he'll survive) and Kenneth was killed and neatly framed for the ripper killings. Juliette lies apparently dead.

You say you are against a recurring ideology from the past. I have no idea what you mean.

Your intepration of events in the spice shop does not square with what happened. I don't see how you cannot see that Nick, possessed by Juliette, about to shoot and kill his best friend was tortured by the prospect.

Juliette became a monster and deserves our hate.