Board Thread:Episode Discussion/@comment-3125844-20150424201205/@comment-25875828-20150511211717

When Juliette was upstairs. You heard a babies cry from down stairs. But the child Juliette picked and was in the car was a child. I would like to think. It shows the real Diana is still a baby. The older Diana is an illusion. I would like to think the writers are that creative. But the more times I watch the last two episodes. The more I come to believe this is just another one of the mistakes on the show.

The problem is there are many shows that pay attention to the details. I don't thin kis one of those shows. At first I tought it was the writers being creative on how they handle what would be contriversal. Such as Kelly's death. With out ambiguity many fans would have not hope that it is a trick, thus deminish the sorrow. Like I said at first. I have come to believe that writers are not that smart. What are mistakes, what is ambiguious is just lazy writing. What we are speculating is our desire to believe the show is a higher quality then it is.

The show seems to be campy trying to bew serious. A real good example. Of all the attemps Sean and Adalind have made against other well beings. That Nick can take a bat to the park and kill a bunch of varrat. And none of this even raises an eyebrow toward an investigation. But let Trubel kill in self defense and all of a sudden thier biggest concern is the investigation.

There are supernatural shows that actuallly address these kind of issues. Shows that don't leave to the viewer to fill in the holdes. "Haven" is one WE knoew about the multiple Audries and why. There is a fix set of rules that control the troubles. Even though week after week they came up with new ones, they are all based on a set of rules. When they did not to break the rules they gave you and explaination of how and why.