Board Thread:General Grimm Discussion/@comment-1.175.95.73-20150528183119/@comment-26144319-20151021013818

209.165.254.251 wrote: you all wanted her to die,she might have burned down the trailer,almost killed monroe,and betrayed nicks mom,but i don't think it's there descion whether a charecter deserve's to die.she was great.just because she was bad on the outside dose'nt mean she was bad on the inside.She problably was trying to get the child and give her back to adiliand so that nick and juliette could be together.she was jelous.i bet she  was jelous on set too.nick +juliette =nulliette but nulliette-juliette just =nick they were perfect for each other.im am so sad she's dead. No she wasn't. She was wooden, at times the damsel in distress, and rarely helped Nick in his work. She literally said, "No child of Adalind is innocent." do you seriously think she would want Adalind's son? No! She would kill him, and spark Nick's insantity, and kill her for real. Also, yes, people get mad about this because these were things or people who are memerable in the show, and now they're gone. And finally, if she wasn't evil on the inside, why didn't at least try to stop the Royals from killing Kelly, or show remorese for the burn of the trailer. Instead she made the excuse that she didn't know Kenneth was gonna do that. Do you seriously think that, a group of people who will do absoultely necessary, can be claimed that they had no idea they were gonna do that action?! NO! And I'm glad she's gone, because she barely was involved in the show, and barely did anything beyond that!