Talk:Varme Tyv/@comment-4273152-20150411075305/@comment-4013655-20150416021628

While the link supplied nicely and accurately explained the concept of negative temperature to others. This concept is not the same as the fictional "Negative heat"  in my block of text.

The key difference in that the heat trsnsferred from a nagative temperature object to positive temparature (say our hands)  can be felt since negative temperature objects are warmer than any positive temperature objects,  whereas "negative heat"  will indirectly make us felt cold due to the cancelling effect

There are no known types of energy in physics that can cancel out each other broadly. Even if considering destructive interference,  the energy is still there in regions around the nodes and you cannot have interference if your energy carried by the wave is changing with time in an almost random way (scientific jargon: The source of the wave lacks coherance) because fhen you need to have perfect knowledge and create a wave that is exactly the inverted version at all positions and also as time passes in order to destructivrly interfere with it and still only create a localised region of less energy

So unfortunately,  my theory remains fictional